Peter Sullivan: Wrongfully Convicted, Repeatedly Ignored, Systematically Broken

They knew. They were warned. They had the evidence.
But they left him to rot.

Peter Sullivan spent more than 7 years in prison for crimes he did not commit.
His conviction wasn’t based on evidence — it was based on police fabrication, flawed interviews, and a system unwilling to admit it made a mistake.

To this day, his case stands as one of the most painful examples of deliberate systemic failure in modern British justice.

⚖️ The Arrest That Never Should Have Happened

Peter was accused of a series of serious offences based on a complaint that quickly collapsed under scrutiny.
Key details in the allegation didn’t match Peter’s profile.
Witness descriptions contradicted each other.
Peter provided clear alibi evidence — but it was ignored.

Instead of conducting an honest investigation, the police pushed forward.
Evidence that should have cleared him was withheld.
Other lines of inquiry were never followed.

🧱 A Conviction Built on Sand

Despite the inconsistencies, Peter was convicted — based largely on the way police coerced and shaped statements to fit their narrative.

No forensic evidence.
No DNA.
No credible timeline.

But once he was inside the system, the truth no longer mattered.

⛓️ Years Behind Bars — and Years Ignored

Peter Sullivan spent over 7 years in prison, proclaiming his innocence.
Like so many others, he was labelled “in denial.”
He was punished not for a crime, but for refusing to confess.

His parole was delayed.
His access to programs was restricted.
He was made an example — because he didn’t play along with their lie.

🧬 Finally Heard — But Still Not Made Whole

Peter’s conviction was eventually overturned.
But even then, no apology.
No compensation.
No accountability.

In fact, the same system that stole his freedom treated him like an inconvenience after release.

The Home Office refused responsibility.
The courts dismissed the scale of the injustice.
And once again, the cost of institutional failure fell entirely on him.

🔁 A Pattern — Not an Exception

Peter Sullivan’s case is not a tragic error.
It’s a pattern:

• Investigate the person, not the crime

• Ignore exculpatory evidence

• Withhold truth from defence

• Deny compensation even when proven wrong

It’s the same pattern behind the stories of Victor Nealon, Sam Hallam, Andrew Malkinson, Oliver Campbell — and so many more.

🛡 Why We Must Speak His Name

At TruthReclaimed, we say their names not because the system forgot — but because it never cared to remember them in the first place.

Peter Sullivan lost years.
He lost his health.
He lost his reputation.

But what he didn’t lose was his truth — and neither will we.