πŸ›‘ IOPC Failures: When the Watchdog Refuses to Bark

Exposing the Independent Office for Police Conduct's Role in Protecting Power, Not People
IOPC Failures

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) exists to hold police and law enforcement accountable. But in reality, it has become a shield for misconduct, a gatekeeper for silence, and a barrier to justice for those wronged by the system.

On this page, you’ll find documented evidence of:

  • πŸ“‚ Ignored or suppressed complaints

  • ⚠️ Failure to investigate police and probation misconduct

  • 🧾 Retaliation against complainants

  • ❌ Institutional cover-ups and procedural stonewalling

🧱 What This Page Contains:

Every article, document, and formal complaint tagged under IOPC is listed below β€” including links to:

  • πŸ”— Official complaint reference numbers (e.g., 2021/159329, 2023/198102, 2024/002824)

  • 🧾 Annexed evidence (AD, AJ, Z, S, etc.)

  • πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ Named officers, institutions, and legal correspondences

  • πŸ“’ Turning Points related to failed oversight

  • 🧠 Analysis and commentary exposing systemic corruption

πŸ“ Key Complaints Against the IOPC:

  • Erased Evidence: COMP1 and COMP1A complaints submitted in prison mysteriously vanished after release

  • No Action on Police Misconduct: PC Craig McMaster and MET officers implicated in defamation and sabotage β€” never investigated

  • Silence on Surveillance Abuse: Probation threats and GPS recall misuse ignored

  • Cover-up of Illicit Evidence Handling: Letters laced with substances, yet no officer held responsible

🚨 You Are Now in the Archive They Tried to Bury

This is not just about failed investigations. It’s about the collapse of public oversight.

We publish everything the IOPC refuses to act on β€” so the public can see what accountability should look like.

Scroll down to access blog posts, annexes, and linked evidence.
πŸ“’ Share. Cite. Act.

This is Truth Reclaimed.
This is Exposed.